In return, Lear expects excessive flattery and gushing confessions of love. In both cases, the natural filial relationship between father and children is destroyed through a lack of awareness, a renunciation of basic fairness and natural order, and hasty judgment based on emotions.
At the same time, Lear fails to see the strength and justice in natural law, and disinherits his youngest child, thus setting in motion the disaster that follows.
In a similar father-child relationship, the opening scene of King Lear positions Gloucester as a thoughtless parent. Although his kingdom should be divided equally, Lear clearly loves Cordelia more and wants to give her the largest, choice section of his wealth.
Their counterparts, Edmund, Goneril, Regan, and Cornwall, represent the evil that functions in violation of natural law. Edmund both ignores and embraces natural law. Again, the natural order of family is ignored.
In the opening act, Lear creates a love test to justify giving Cordelia a larger share of his kingdom. In one of the initial pieces of information offered about Edmund, Gloucester tells Kent that Edmund has been away seeking his fortune, but he has now returned.
They may have genuinely loved their father at one time, but they now seem tired of having been passed over in favor of their younger sister. Natural law is synonymous with the moral authority usually associated with divine justice.
In many ways, Gloucester is responsible for what Edmund becomes. Although Gloucester says that he loves both Edmund and Edgar equally, society does not regard the two as equal — and neither does Gloucester, whose love is limited to words and not actions of equality.
Their deaths are a result of unnatural competition, both for power and for love. The audience learns early in the final scene that Goneril has poisoned Regan and killed herself. Those who adhere to the tenets of natural law are those characters in the text who act instinctively for the common good — Kent, Albany, Edgar, and Cordelia.
Both men are easily fooled and consequently, they both reject natural law and their children.
In almost identical fashion, the subplot reveals another father, Gloucester, who betrays his older legitimate son and who is betrayed by his younger illegitimate son. We grow impatient with our parents and they with us.We will write a custom essay sample on Parent-Child Relationship in “King Lear” specifically for you for only $ $/page.
Lear is not only a king, he's also a family patriarch whose plans to divvy up his kingdom among his daughters backfires, causing a civil war that gets played out as a large scale family crisis.
Lear's family isn't the only dysfunctional crew in the play—the drama between Gloucester and his sons heightens the sense that King Lear is a. Essays - largest database of quality sample essays and research papers on King Lear Family Relationships.
We will write a custom essay sample on King Lear: Family Relationships, Human Nature and Its Failings specifically for you for only $ $/page Order now.
There are many family relationships in the plot of King Lear, with the two major ones relating to the sub plot of Gloucester and the main plot of Lear. In both these relationships, betrayal is the major factor that contributes to the deterioration of the kinship. Deception, working both ways, takes place in the parent-child relationships in this tragedy.
The closeness of the characters is a strong catalyst that brought on the strong theme of betrayal. King Lear Essay, Family: A Medium for a Betrayal March 16, Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of King Lear. 2nd ed. Toronto: Harcourt Shakespeare.Download